The agent said it.
Show the evidence.
Bring AI-receptionist claims, tool results, and business rules into one review. Document what the evidence supports—and what remains unresolved.
Human judgment. Traceable rationale. No automated certification.
“Your appointment is confirmed.”
Our design commitments
01 / The review workspace
One claim.
A complete evidence trail.
Designed for the agency owner checking bookings, transfers, and messages—not another conversation-quality dashboard. Follow the claim from its exact wording to the rule, evidence, and reviewer conclusion.
RULE-001 · VERSION 1.0
Confirm an appointment only after the scheduling system explicitly confirms success.
Transcript: agent confirms Tuesday at 10 a.m.
Tool result: booking failed; slot unavailable.
Supplied test-calendar record: no matching appointment in the defined context.
Evidence is supplied by the reviewer. These fictional records illustrate a review, not independently verified facts.
Set the standard
Record the review scope, limitations, and exact business-rule version. Keep the approval status visible.
Connect the records
Link transcripts, tool results, calendar or CRM records, and screenshots to a case with stable evidence references.
Explain the conclusion
Assess the action, claim, and policy separately. Link supporting and contradictory evidence, and name what is missing.
02 / Separate the judgments
A failed booking isn't
always a failed response.
An agent can accurately report a failed action. Three independent assessments keep operational outcomes separate from truthful claims and rule compliance.
Missing outcome records? Unknown and Unresolved are valid conclusions—not gaps to hide.
03 / Keep the story intact
Retest the correction.
Don't erase the finding.
The planned workflow keeps original evidence and conclusions alongside new retests. Record what reportedly changed, who reported it, and what the next review actually supports.
History with context
Follow material changes to rules, assessments, findings, and retests. Application history—not a claim of tamper-proof storage.
Reports that show their work
The MVP scope includes readable reports and JSON exports with rule versions, evidence references, reviewer rationale, and unresolved questions. Attachments are referenced, not embedded.
04 / Commercial access
Know the terms before you commit.
Pricing and purchase terms are being defined separately from the MVP. Confirm the price, access duration, workspace and storage limits, available features, access date, and support and refund terms before purchasing.
Free
For individuals getting started
$0/month
- 1 workspace
- Up to 3 team members
- Basic analytics
- Community support
Clear boundaries
Evidence review.
Not a seal of approval.
Start with the claim
Make the evidence
part of the conversation.
Give your next AI-receptionist review a clear scope, an explicit rationale, and a record of what remains unknown.